Dubertia Dialogues

Free text in.

That's all you've got.

Now tell me what you're asking it to do.

Got a note on the table,

words all loose,

first question ain't the model — it's what kind of truth?

You got boxes already?

Then choose one.

Category, urgency, yes or no —

job done.

Choose from de shelf,

choose from de line,

answer dem waiting before input arrive.

Low,

medium, high

— already defined, bounded little judgement,

nice and confined.

Do you choose it?

Or construct it?

Choose it — answers waiting there.

Construct it — answer wasn't there.

Do you choose it?

Or construct it?

Now SBAR lands,

paragraph long,

symptoms in the middle,

history gone wandering on.

Situation?

Pull what matters.

Background?

Build the frame.

Assessment from the words they wrote

— not picking from three names.

No little menu fi every sentence inside,

note come different every time.

Take what de clinician put in de page,

shape it, structure it,

put it in place.

BAH—bah. BAH—bah. That's the line.

Not clever versus stupid.

Not old versus new.

One asks:

which known answer?

One asks: what is actually here?

If de boundaries known before de note arrive— choose,

choose, choose.

If de structure haffi rise from de words inside— build it from

de truth.

SBAR—

Situation!

Background!

Assessment!

Recommendation!

Could be urgency.

Could be category.

Could be flag.

Dat one bounded.

Could be symptoms.

Could be history.

Could be measurements from a paragraph nobody predicted.

Dat one constructed.

CHOOSE IT!

CONSTRUCT IT!

Known answers — choose it!

Open content

—

construct it! CHOOSE IT!

CONSTRUCT IT! Same note coming in— different question underneath it!

Don't ask

what model sound clever—

Ask what the output is allowed to be.

If you know every answer— Choose.

If

the answer

has to come from the note— CONSTRUCT.

Free text in.

Two different questions.

Wahhh— Choose...

or construct...